|
limited partners." Thus limited partnership law expressly |
| references general partnership law for general partner liability |
| and does not separately consider the liability of such partners. |
| The liability of a general partner of a limited partnership that |
| becomes a LLLP would therefore be the liability of a general |
| partner in an LLP and would be governed by Section 306. The |
| liability of a limited partner in a LLLP is a more complicated |
| matter. RULPA Section 303(a) separately considers the liability of |
| a limited partner. Unless also a general partner, a limited |
| partner is not liable for the obligations of a limited partnership |
| unless the partner participates in the control of the business and |
| then only to persons reasonably believing the limited partner is a |
| general partner. Therefore, arguably limited partners in a LLLP |
| will have the specific RULPA Section 303(c) liability shield while |
| general partners will have a superior Section 306(c) liability |
| shield. In order to clarify limited partner liability and other |
| linkage issues, States that have adopted RUPA, these limited |
| liability partnership rules, and RULPA may wish to consider an |
| amendment to RULPA. A suggested form of such an amendment is: |