| This section partially follows and partially rejects the UPA |
| (1973) requirements regarding who must be named as parties in a |
| parentage proceeding. First, contra to UPA (1973), the child is |
| not a necessary party. Few states require children as necessary |
| parties. Further, with the widespread use of DNA testing, such a |
| requirement has outlived its usefulness. On the other hand, |
| failure to join a child as a party may later result in a child's |
| successful collateral attack on the original determination of |
| paternity to be filed by the child. This subject is discussed |
| more fully in the comment to § 637, infra. |