| Finally, subsection (b) is a complete rewrite of UPA (1973) § |
| 4(b). The requirement that a presumption "may be rebutted only by |
| clear and convincing evidence" was eliminated from the Act. The |
| same fate was accorded the statement that: "If two or more |
| presumptions arise which conflict with each other, the |
| presumption which on the facts is founded on the weightier |
| considerations of policy and logic controls." Nowadays the |
| existence of modern genetic testing obviates this old approach to |
| the problem of conflicting presumptions when a court is to |
| determine paternity. Nowadays, genetic testing makes it possible |
| in most cases to resolve competing claims to paternity. Moreover, |
| courts may use the estoppel principles in § 608 in appropriate |
| circumstances to deny requests for genetic testing in the |
| interests of preserving a child's ties to the presumed or |
| acknowledged father who openly held himself out as the child's |
| father regardless of whether he is in fact the genetic father. |