§11288. Violation
                  1. 
                                Failure to comply; first offense. 
                                An offender who in fact fails to comply with any duty imposed under this chapter or a rule adopted pursuant to this chapter commits a Class D crime.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW).]
              
                  2. 
                                Failure to comply; 2nd offense. 
                                A person who has one prior conviction under this section or section 11227 and who in fact fails to comply with any duty imposed under this chapter or a rule adopted pursuant to this chapter commits a Class C crime.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2015, c. 280, §18 (AMD).]
              
                  3. 
                                Failure to comply; 3rd offense. 
                                A person who has 2 or more prior convictions under this section or section 11227 and who in fact fails to comply with any duty imposed under this chapter or a rule adopted pursuant to this chapter commits a Class B crime.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2015, c. 280, §18 (AMD).]
              
                  4. 
                                Strict liability. 
                                Violation of this section is a strict liability crime as defined in Title 17‑A, section 34, subsection 4‑A.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW).]
              
                  5. 
                                Prior convictions. 
                                
                  Title 17‑A, section 9‑A governs the use of prior convictions when determining a sentence.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW).]
              
                  6. 
                                Affirmative defense. 
                                It is an affirmative defense that the failure to comply with a duty imposed under this chapter or a rule adopted pursuant to this chapter resulted from just cause.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW).]
              
                  7. 
                                Permissible inference. 
                                Proof that the name and date of birth of the person charged with a violation of this section are the same as those of a person who has been sentenced for an offense requiring registration pursuant to this chapter gives rise to a permissible inference under the Maine Rules of Evidence, Rule 303 that the person charged with a violation of this section is the same person as that person convicted of the offense requiring registration.
                                     
                                
                [PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW).]
              
                        SECTION HISTORY
                        
            PL 2011, c. 663, §3 (NEW). PL 2015, c. 280, §18 (AMD).