| 125th MAINE LEGISLATURE | ||||||
| LD 1289 | LR 1786(01) | |||||
| An Act To Waive Penalties on School Administrative District No. 32 and School Administrative District No. 33 under the School Administrative Unit Consolidation Laws | ||||||
| Preliminary Fiscal Impact Statement for Original Bill | ||||||
| Sponsor: Sen. Jackson of Aroostook | ||||||
| Committee: Education and Cultural Affairs | ||||||
| Fiscal Note Required: Yes | ||||||
| Preliminary Fiscal Impact Statement | ||||||
| FY 2011-12 | FY 2012-13 | Projections FY 2013-14 | Projections FY 2014-15 | |||
| Net Cost (Savings) | ||||||
| General Fund | $122,464 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| Appropriations/Allocations | ||||||
| General Fund | $122,464 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ||
| Fiscal Detail and Notes | ||||||
| The General Purpose Aid for Locals Schools program within the Department of Education will require a one-time General Fund appropriation of $122,464 in fiscal year 2011-12 for the cost associated with reimbursing School Administrative Unit (SAU) #32 and School Administrative Unit # 33 for the amount that their fiscal year 2011-12 state subsidy was reduced for not complying with the laws governing school administrative unit reorganization. This preliminary fiscal impact statement assumes that, since the state's budget for fiscal year 2011-12 and the budgets of local SAU's for the 2011-2012 school year will be set well before this legislation becomes effective, a General Fund appropriation will be provided so those school administrative units who did comply with the school reorganization laws will not be negatively impacted. | ||||||
| If this legislation, in its final form, does not include a General Fund appropriation of $122,464 in fiscal year 2011-12, the Department of Education will be required to recalculate the amount of subsidy to be distributed to local SAU's in the 2011-2012 school year. This redistribution will result in conforming SAU's receiving less subsidy from the state than originally budgeted and non-conforming SAU's receiving more. However, there would be no net impact to the General Fund. | ||||||