PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney.
An Act To Comprehensively Address Grand Jury Territorial Authority To Indict for Crimes
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:
Sec. 1. 15 MRSA §1255-A  is enacted to read:
§ 1255-A.  Grand jury territorial authority to indict for crimes
 
1.  General rule.     Grand jury territorial authority to indict for crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court must be exercised by the grand jury serving the county where the crime was committed.
 
2.  Exceptions.     The following are exceptions to subsection 1.
 
A.  If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court creates judicial regions for venue purposes pursuant to Title 4, section 19, each grand jury in a multicounty judicial region may share authority to indict for crimes committed in that judicial region.
 
B.  Grand jury territorial authority to indict for crimes may also be exercised as otherwise provided by law.
 
3.  Administration.      The Supreme Judicial Court shall establish by rule or administrative order how and to what extent the shared authority of each grand jury in a multicounty judicial region to indict under subsection 2 may be exercised.
Sec. 2. 15 MRSA §1256,  as amended by PL 1973, c. 567, §20, is further amended to read:
§ 1256. Grand jury to present all crimes
Grand juries shall present all offenses cognizable by the court at which they attendcrimes for which by law they are given territorial authority to indict, and may appoint one of their number to take minutes of their proceedings to be delivered to the attorney, if the jury so directs. When they are dismissed before the court adjourns, they may be summoned again, on any special occasion, at such time as the court directs. Evidence relating to offenses cognizable by the court may be offered to the grand jury by the Attorney General, the district attorney, the assistant district attorney and, at the discretion of the presiding justice, by such other persons as said presiding justice may permit.
 
SUMMARY
Under Maine law, grand jury territorial authority to indict for any crime coming within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court is directly tied to the criminal trial venue of that court. State v. True, 330 A.2d 787, 790 (Me. 1975) ("The same factors which bear on venue [for the Superior Court] will also determine the grand jury’s territorial authority.") As used in this context, venue designates the particular county in which the Superior Court is authorized to exercise its jurisdictional authority to decide a particular criminal case. Id. at 789. Rule 21(a)(1) of the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure currently fixes Superior Court venue as follows: "The trial shall be in the county in which the crime was committed, except as otherwise provided by law." The Maine Revised Statutes, Title 15, section 1256 currently provides the "statutory definition of a grand jury’s territorial jurisdiction." Id. at 790, n.3. It reads: "Grand jurors shall present all offenses cognizable by the court at which they attend...." As a consequence, except as otherwise provided by law, a grand jury’s jurisdictional authority to indict is limited to crimes committed within the county for which it serves. Numerous statutes currently provide flexibility as to criminal trial venue by allowing for a prosecution to be brought in a venue (county) other than the county in which the criminal conduct occurred. See, e.g., Title 15, section 3 and Title 17-A, sections 352, subsection 5, paragraph E; 506, subsection 2; 552, subsection 2-A; 703, subsection 3; 708, subsection 3-A; 755, subsection 3-A; 805, subsection 1-B; and 1106-A. These statutory exceptions that fix the trial venue of the Superior Court simultaneously serve to broaden a grand jury’s jurisdictional authority as well. See, e.g., State v. True, 330 A.2d at 790 (Me. 1995) (addressing crimes committed within 100 rods of a county line (Title 15, section 3)) and State v. Chasse, 2002 ME 90, ¶¶ 7, 8, 797 A.2d 1262, 1264-65 (addressing crime of escape (Title 17-A, section 755, subsection 3-A))).
The bill does the following.
1. It defines grand jury territorial authority expressly, rather than in terms of trial venue for the Superior Court.
2. It identifies the general rule applicable to grand jury jurisdiction. Grand jury territorial authority to indict for crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court must be exercised by the grand jury serving the county where the crime was committed.
3. It introduces a new statutory exception relative to grand juries in judicial regions when such regions are created by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court for venue purposes, pursuant to Title 4, section 19. Specifically, it provides that each grand jury in a multicounty judicial region may share authority to indict for crimes committed in that judicial region except as limited by rule or administrative order of the Supreme Judicial Court.
4. It expressly recognizes the existence of special laws that constitute exceptions to the general rule.
The bill also amends Title 15, section 1256 to eliminate that portion that currently contains a definition of a grand jury’s territorial jurisdiction, since the new section 1255-A comprehensively addresses a grand jury’s jurisdiction. The new language is intended to identify the basic duty imposed upon grand juries, which is to present all crimes over which by law they have jurisdiction.