| | |
the holdings that "fraud" as used in the federal and state | | securities statutes is not limited to common law deceit. See | | generally 7 Louis Loss & Joel Seligman, Securities Regulation 3421- | | 3448 (3d ed. 1991). |
|
| | | 12. Section 102(10): Guaranteed: Prior Provisions: 1956 Act | | Section 401(e); RUSA Section 401(a)(1). The 1956 Act definition | | of "guaranteed" applies generally to payment of "principal, | | interest, or dividends." The RUSA definition of "guaranteed," | | which was solely applicable to exempt securities, applied to the | | guarantee of "all or substantially all of principal and interest | | or dividends." |
|
| | | Section 102(10) follows the 1956 Act approach and applies | | generally to the guarantee of "all principal and all interest." | | Any method of guarantee that results in a guarantee of payment of | | all principal and all interest will suffice including, for | | example, an irrevocable letter of credit. |
|
| | | This definition does not address whether or not a guarantee, | | whether whole or partial, is itself a security. That issue is | | addressed by the definition of "security" in Section 102(28). |
|
| | | 13. Section 102(11): Institutional investor: Prior | | Provisions: RUSA Section 101(5); Securities Act of 1933 Rules | | 144A and 501(a). |
|
| | | Sections 102(11)(A) through (K) are based on Rule 501(a) of | | the Securities Act of 1933, but do not include the paragraphs of | | Rule 501(a) that address individuals. Given the significant | | period of time since Rule 501(a) was adopted, this Act has used a | | $10 million minimum for several categories of institutional | | investor rather than $5 million minimum used in Rule 501(a). |
|
| | | Section 102(11)(H) concludes with an except clause meant to | | exclude self-directed plans for individuals from this definition. |
|
| | | With respect to the exclusion of Rule 144A(a)(1)(H) from | | Section 102(11)(M), the substance of Rule 144A(a)(1)(H) appears | | in Section 102(11)(I), but with a requirement of total assets in | | excess of $10,000,000. |
|
| | | Section 102(11)(O) is meant to reach persons similar to those | | listed in Sections 102(11)(A) through (N), but not otherwise | | listed. Under Section 503, if challenged in a proceeding, the | | burden of proving the availability of an exemption is on the | | person claiming it. An interpretive opinion may be sought from | | the administrator under Section 605(d). |
|
|