LD 1600
pg. 82
Page 81 of 360 An Act To Recodify the Laws Governing Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Page 83 of 360
Download Bill Text
LR 2121
Item 1

 
stating the results of the analysis.__That certificate, when
duly signed and sworn to by the certified person, is
admissible in evidence in any court of the State.__It is
prima facie evidence that the percentage by weight of
alcohol in the defendant's blood was, at the time the breath
sample was taken, as stated in the certificate, unless, with
10 days' written notice to the prosecution, the defendant
requests that the operator or other qualified witness
testify as to the results of the analysis.

 
C.__Transfer of sample specimens to and from a laboratory
for purposes of analysis must be by certified or registered
mail and, when so made, is deemed to comply with all
requirements regarding the continuity of custody of physical
evidence.

 
D.__The failure of a person to comply with the duty to
submit to and complete a chemical test under section 10702,
subsection 1 is admissible in evidence on the issue of
whether that person was under the influence of intoxicating
liquor or drugs.__If the law enforcement officer having
probable cause to believe that the person hunted wild
animals or wild birds or operated or attempted to operate a
watercraft, snowmobile or ATV while under the influence of
intoxicating liquor or drugs fails to give either of the
warnings required under subsection 2, the failure of the
person to comply with the duty to submit to a chemical test
is not admissible, except when a test was required pursuant
to subsection 11.__If a failure to submit to and complete a
chemical test is not admitted into evidence, the court may
inform the jury of the fact that a test result is not
available.

 
E.__If a test result is not available for a reason other
than a person's failure to comply with the duty to submit to
and complete a chemical test, the unavailability and the
reason are admissible in evidence.

 
8.__Statements by accused.__Any statement by a defendant that
the defendant was the operator of a watercraft, snowmobile or ATV
that the defendant is accused of operating in violation of
section 10701, subsection 1 is admissible if it was made
voluntarily and is otherwise admissible under the United States
Constitution or the Constitution of Maine.__The statement may
constitute sufficient proof by itself, without further proof of
corpus delicti, that the watercraft, snowmobile or ATV was
operated by the defendant.__Any statement by a defendant that the
defendant was hunting wild animals or wild birds is admissible
against a defendant accused of hunting wild animals or wild birds
in violation of section 10701, subsection 1 if the statement was


Page 81 of 360 Top of Page Page 83 of 360