| Some states have already adopted similar prohibitions. See, |
| e.g., Cal. Evid. Code Section 1121 (West 1997); Fla. Stat. |
| Ann. Section 373.71 (1999) (water resources); Tex. Civ. Prac. |
| & Rem. Code Section 154.053 (c) (West 1999) (general). |
| Disclosures of mediation communications to a judge also could |
| run afoul of prohibitions against ex parte communications with |
| judges. See Code of Conduct for Federal Judges, Canon 3(A)(3), |
| 175 F.R.D. 364, 367 (1998); American Bar Association Model |
| Code of Conduct of Judicial Conduct at 9. The purpose of this |
| Section is consistent with the conclusions of seminal reports |
| in the mediation field condemn the use of such reports as |
| permitting coercion by the mediator and destroying confidence |
| in the neutrality of the mediator and in the mediation |
| process. See Society for Professionals in Dispute Resolution, |
| Mandated Participation and Settlement Coercion: Dispute |
| Resolution as it Relates to the Courts (1991); Center for |
| Dispute Settlement, National Standards for Court-Connected |
| Mediation Programs (D.C. 1992). |