LD 185
pg. 4
Page 3 of 6 An Act to Enhance Enforcement of the Gambling Laws Page 5 of 6
Download Bill Text
LR 336
Item 1

 
officer has probable cause to believe the property seized is an
illegal gambling machine.

 
§960.__Criminal forfeiture

 
1.__Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person
convicted of a violation of this chapter forfeits to the State
all rights, privileges, interests and claims to property that is
subject to forfeiture pursuant to section 959.__All rights,
privileges, interests and title in property subject to forfeiture
under this section vest in the State upon the commission of the
act giving rise to forfeiture pursuant to section 959.

 
2.__Property subject to forfeiture that is not yet the subject
of a final order pursuant to section 959 may be proceeded against
by indictment or superseding indictment of the grand jury in any
related criminal proceeding in which one or more persons with an
interest in the property have been simultaneously indicted for
one or more violations of this chapter.__At any time prior to
trial, the State, with the consent of the court and any defendant
with an interest in the property, may file an ancillary charging
instrument or information alleging that that property is subject
to criminal forfeiture.__Upon commencement of a criminal
forfeiture by indictment or information of any property that may
be the subject of any pending civil action commenced pursuant to
section 959, the civil action must be immediately stayed and
subrogated to the criminal forfeiture action.__Discovery in the
criminal action must be as provided by the Maine Rules of
Criminal Procedure.

 
3.__Property subject to forfeiture that has not already been
seized but has been indicted by the grand jury pursuant to this
section may also be ordered seized based upon the grand jury's
finding of probable cause pursuant to section 959.

 
4.__Trial against property charged by indictment or
information may be by jury and must be held in a single
proceeding together with the trial of the related criminal
violation.__Forfeiture of the property must be proved by the
State by a preponderance of the evidence.__The court, in its
discretion, may allow any defendant with an interest in property
indicted pursuant to this section to waive the right to trial by
jury as against the property while preserving the right to trial
by jury of any crime alleged.__At trial by jury, the court, upon
motion of a defendant or the State, may separate the trial of the
matter against the defendant from the trial of the matter against
the property subject to criminal forfeiture.__If the court
bifurcates the jury trial, the court shall first instruct and
submit to the jury the issue of the guilt or innocence of
defendants to be determined by proof beyond a reasonable doubt


Page 3 of 6 Top of Page Page 5 of 6