LD 2011
pg. 1
LD 2011 Title Page An Act to Amend the Laws Regarding Asset Forfeiture Page 2 of 3
Download Bill Text
LR 2744
Item 1

 
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Maine as follows:

 
Sec. 1. 15 MRSA §5826, sub-§§2, 4 and 6, as enacted by PL 1995, c. 421,
§1, are amended to read:

 
2. Commencement of criminal forfeiture action. Property
subject to forfeiture that is not yet the subject of a final
order pursuant to section 5822, subsection 4 may be proceeded
against by indictment or superseding indictment of the grand jury
or by complaint in the District Court in any related criminal
proceeding in which one or more persons a person with an interest
in the property have has been simultaneously indicted for one or
more violations charged with a violation of Title 17-A, chapter
45. At any time prior to trial, the State, with the consent of
the court and any defendant with an interest in the property, may
file an ancillary charging instrument or information alleging
that property is subject to criminal forfeiture. Upon
commencement of a criminal forfeiture by indictment or
information of any property that may be the subject of any
pending civil action commenced pursuant to section 5822, the
civil action must be immediately stayed and subrogated to the
criminal forfeiture action. Discovery in the criminal action
must be as provided for by the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure.

 
4. Trial proceedings. Trial against property charged by
indictment or, information or complaint may be by jury and must
be held in a single proceeding together with the trial of the
related criminal violation. Forfeiture of the property must be
proved by the State by a preponderance of the evidence. The
court, in its discretion, may allow any defendant with an
interest in property indicted pursuant to this section to waive
the right to trial by jury as against the property while
preserving the right to trial by jury of any crime alleged. At
trial by jury, the court, upon motion of a defendant or the
State, may separate the trial of the matter against the defendant
from the trial of the matter against the property subject to
criminal forfeiture. If the court bifurcates the jury trial, the
court shall first instruct and submit to the jury the issue of
the guilt or innocence of defendants to be determined by proof
beyond a reasonable doubt and shall restrict argument of counsel
to those issues. After a verdict upon the guilt or innocence of
all defendants, the court shall instruct and submit to the jury
the issue of the forfeiture of the property to be determined by
proof by a preponderance of the evidence and the court shall
restrict argument to those issues. A special verdict must be
returned as to the extent of the interest or property subject to
forfeiture, if any.

 
A.__Forfeiture of the property must be proved by the State
by a preponderance of the evidence.


LD 2011 Title Page Top of Page Page 2 of 3